Thursday 29 August 2013

Women Directors in Indian Cinema

A lot has been written, talked and discussed these days about ‘status of women in India’. Much gender sensationalization has been happening. In this context it is interesting to have a look at the Hindi cinema.
What is the situation of women who are working in an industry which has more than thousands of crores of rupees of turn over? No, I am not talking about how on-screen women portrayal in Hindi cinema. This article deals with women who work behind the camera. What is the off-screen situation? This is more an attempt to raise some questions than to provide answers. But raising questions here is very important too, because cinema is not just any random industry but it is a very powerful and effective medium of cultural communication.
The famous film director Zoya Akhtar recounts a story from the time when she was directing her first film (Luck by Chance-2009). Whenever the shot was ready, one of her assistants used ask her brother Farhaan Akhar (who was an actor in that film) to check whether everything was ok or not. She ignored this a few times, but finally she had to tell him that ‘she’ was the director of the film. She asked him to accept it, or leave. This story reflects the mindset towards women, which is the same in many fields. In many fields, typical men cannot work under female boss.
There are a few female directors who are well known for their meaningful cinema. Aparna Sen, Meera Nair, Deepa Mehta, Sai Paranjape, Kalpana Lazmi are some of them.  They have created their own space. Their films were never typical Bollywood masala movies, but comments (I do not mean messages) on society. Most of their stories were on social issues, and unfortunately this stereotyped them. Female director means social issue or women centric films, this equation was formed in the industry.
The famous film critic Anupama Chopra says that the industry never cares for who is working behind the camera. An investor never thinks whether the director is a female or a male – he wants return on money.  Producers are interested only in stories. But no one will invest 80 crores in women centric films, because they do not get commercial success. It has been proved again and again. If Ms. Chopra has a point, then it is clear that why commercial success is very important for any movie. Most of the films directed by above mentioned female directors were critically acclaimed but hardly any of their movies were runaway hits. Not only above mentioned directors but new directors like Tanuja Chandra, Bhavna Talwar, Shonali Bose, Meghna Guljar also got good reviews, but not good collection at the box office. Commercial success is directly related to viewers’ choice. And common viewers do not look for the director’s name. So can we conclude that female directors have failed to satisfy common viewers? Do female directors miss the pulse of the common viewers?
                During the silent era, a female actor, who was not getting good roles, decided to make a film on her own. Fatima Begum was her name. She started her own ‘Fatima Film Corporation’ and directed a movie ‘Bulbul-e-Paristan’ in 1926. She is on record as India’s first female director. From 1926 to 2013, the number of female directors is not at all heartening. Like Fatima, there have been many actors who tried their luck in direction. The list includes Sadhana (Geeta Mera Naam),  Hema Malini (Dil Ashna Hai),  Deepa Sahi (Tere Mere Phere),  Deepti Naval (Do Paise ki Dhoop, Char Aane ki Barish)  and Nandita Das (Firaaq). This is not a comprehensive list, but we can get the idea that female directors have had to struggle a lot for commercial success.
The film industry is not a very attractive place to be in, because of its uncertainty of time, work, money and success. In any other field, if you work hard, without caring for money and time, you may get success. But in the film industry, the equation is never this simple. Is this a reason why there are less numbers of females behind the camera? A person who is not associated with this industry in any way finds it very hard to get a break; for a woman it is much harder. All the famous and successful women directors of these days have had associations with this industry for many years. Zoya Akhtar, Farha Khan, Pooja Bhatt have grown in this industry. It is like their family business. Bela Sehgal (Director of ‘Shirin Farhad ki to Nikal Padi) is the sister of the famous director Sanjay Leela Bhansali who is the producer of her film. But what is quite interesting here is that the big dads of the industry like Yash Raj, Dharma and Rajshri Productions have never introduced a female director. Mahesh Bhatt has been an an exception. He not only introduced Tanuja Chandra as a film director but produced many of her films like Dushman, Sangharsh, Yeh Zindagi ka Safar. His daughter Pooja Bhatt is also a famous film director.


Different websites give lists of female directors. These lists are dominated by directors from South Indian film industry. T. Rajlakshmi directed ‘Miss Kamala’, a Tamil movie in 1936. She opened the doors of direction for women. Today, there are many women like Prema Karanth, Revathi, Madhumitha, Saundarya, Nandini Reddy working behind the camera, and also doing well commercially. Vijaya Nirmala was honored by Guinness Book Records (in 2000) for being the ‘female directors with the biggest number of films’. She is from the south. Revathi has directed a movie ‘Mitr-My Friend’, which was an ‘all women’ experiment. Her films have received both appreciation as well as good collection. She is from the south. too The number of female directors, producers, technicians in the South Indian film industry is quite impressive. Does it have any connection with the education, awareness, the treatment given to women in this society? It is important to find the answer of this question.

So much for India. What is the scene in world cinema, or at least in Hollywood? Give it a search. IDMB gives you the top 100 directors of the world (the list was published in 2010), and amazingly there isn't a single woman there. The reputed English Daily Guardian gives you the top 40 directors of all time, the list has only two female names. In the history of 85 years of Oscar, only four women were nominated for ‘Best Director’, and there is only one winner till date. She is Kathryn Bigelow and the film was ‘The Hurt Locker’ in 2010. Does this mean that ‘movie making is not a field for women who want to work behind the camera? It is important to find out the answer to this question, because
The scenario in the Indian Film Industry, fortunately, is changing. The rate of change is slow but still considerable. In last two-three years lots of female directors have come forward. The list includes, Rajshri Ojha (Ayesha), Anusha Rizavi (Peepli Live), Kiran Rao (Dhobi Ghat), Anu Menon (London, Paris, New York), Barnali Ray Shukla (Kuchh Love Jaisa), Alankrita Shrivastava (Turning 30), Leena Yadav (Teen Patti), Reema Kagti (Talaash) and Gauri Shinde (English-Vinglish). Besides direction, the number of women is increasing in other areas of film making too. Sharmishta Roy (Art Direction), Aarti Bajaj (Editing), Sneha Khanwalkar (Music) and Ekta Kapoor (Production) are doing well in their fields. This is a change – a slow change, but a most welcome one.
Women have a different view of the world than men. They have their own perspectives on issues which are certain to be different from men’s. It is important that they get an opportunity to express themselves. Perhaps we need to wait for a new dawn in which the gender sensitivity gets transcended.



Tuesday 22 January 2013

जाहिराती, गाणी आणि महिला


महिलांच्या एकूण परिस्थिती विषयी खूप बोललं गेलं, कंटाळा येईपर्यंत चर्चा झाली. कायद्यात आणि मानसिकतेत बदलांच्या गोष्टी झाल्या. पण स्वतःला सुसंकृत-सुशिक्षित-सुज्ञ समजणाऱ्या समाज नावाच्या व्यवस्थेत  खरचं बदल होणार का? आपल्या सगळ्या चर्चा एका ''फेविकॉल'' ने झडून गेल्या. महिलांकडे पाहण्याचा एकूण दृष्टीकोन कसा होता, कसा आहे याची काही उदाहरणं.


खालील  जाहिरातींवरचा हा लेख नुकताच वाचनात आला. या लेखात  अशा जाहिरातींचा सब-कोन्शिअस लेवलवर कसा  परिणाम होत असतो ते लिहून  अशा जाहिरातींवर गंभीर विचार करण्याची गरज मांडण्यात आली आहे.




                                                                       मदर डेअरी

                                                                 फेअर एंड लवली

बजाज सी एफ एल  बल्ब



हनी सिंग वरतीही बरीच होऊन गेली. त्या गोंधळात अनेकांनी त्याचं समर्थन केलं. त्या विषयाच्या संदर्भात  फर्स्ट पोस्ट डॉट कॉम वर वाचलेला हा एक लेख या लेखात हनी सिंग सारखे तर बरेच आहेत आणि खूप आधीपासून आहेत असं लिहित अनेक भाषांमधल्या अनेक आक्षेपार्ह गाण्यांची उदाहरणं दिली आहेत.



परदेशी मासिकातल्या महिलांसंबंधी जाहिरातींवरची ही एक क्लिप




बदलांची सुरुवात वैयक्तिक पातळीवरच होऊ शकेल.

Friday 18 January 2013

रूमी


१२ व्या शतकातील सुफी संत आणि कवी जलाल उद्दीन  मुहम्मद रुमी हा रुमी नावाने अधिक

लोकप्रिय.  सध्याच्या तजाकिस्तान मधला त्याचा जन्म. त्याच्या कवितांची बरीच पुस्तकं बाजारात

आहेत. मस्नवि, इसेन्शिअल रुमी, दि इल्युमीनेटेड रुमी, से आय एम यु ही त्याची काही अनुवादित

पुस्तकं. मूळ  पर्शियन भाषेतील्या  इंग्रजी अनुवादित काही ओळी....

पहिल्या कवितेची एकापेक्षा जास्त वर्जन्स ऑनलाईन उपलब्ध  आहेत, त्यापैकी एकातील काही ओळी

What can be done, O believers, as I don't recognize myself? I'm neither a Christian nor Jew, Magian nor Moslem.
I'm not of the East or West; neither land nor sea;
I'm not of Nature's mine; nor the stars in Heaven.

I'm not of earth, water, air or fire;
I'm not of Heaven, nor the dust on this carpet.
I'm not of India, China, Bulgaria nor Saqsin;
I'm not of the kingdom of Iraq, nor Khorasan.
I'm not of this world, nor the next, Paradise nor Hell;
I'm not of Adam, nor Eve, Eden nor Rizwan.
My place is in the Placeless, my trace in the Traceless;
I'm neither body nor soul, as I belong to the soul of the Beloved.
I have dispensed with duality, and seen the two worlds as One.
One I seek; One I know, One I see, One I call

Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and righdoing
there is a field. I'll meet you there.
When the soul lies down in that grass,
the world is too full to talk about
Ideas, language even the phrase 'each other'
doesn't make any sense

Tuesday 15 January 2013

Beaten by Politics

“’To put things in perspective, India won an all-time high, six individual medals at the 2012 London Olympics. But it was not thanks to the sports federations. It was a grit of individual sportspersons that did it. Of the six Olympic medal winners, four were supported by Olympic Gold Quest and one by the Mittal Champions Trust. Embroiled in internal politics, government bodies have been failing Indian sports for decades.”
“Sports is not a priority in our country. To be a sportsman is not something that we, as a nation, are particularly proud of. So, when parents are pushed to choose between studies and sports, the unanimous choice is an always academics.”
“Identifying talent at the grassroots level is the key and this is something the West and China learnt a long time ago. England has created a system called ‘Talent ID’ for all the Olympic sports. They look athletes and based on the physical requirements of a sports, they identify the potential of the child through quantitative measurements and develop them from an early age for specialist sports.’’
“Fifteen of the 39 Indian Olympic Association constituent federations and 23 of 33 State Olympic Association presidents are politicians.”
                                                                             Marathon Men
Sports Federation
Head-In charge
Political Affiliation
Duration
Archery Association of India
V.K. Malhotra
BJP
40 years
Judo Federation of  India
Jagdish Tytler
Congress
14 years
Table Tennis Federation of India
Ajay Singh Chautala
INL
14 years
All India Football Federation
P.R. Dasmunshi
Congress
20 years
Athletics Federation of India
Lalit Bhanot
-
24 years
Indian Olympic Association
Suresh Kalmadi
Congress
16 years


…but politics is just the tip of the iceberg, the rot runs much deeper.
Avalok Langer examines why we are not a sporting nation
Tehelka

Sunday 13 January 2013

Mahesh Elkunchwar

Wada Chrebandi (Marathi Play) was recently translated into French and professional actors did a dramatic reading of it for an invited audience in Paris.
(The English press) They call us Bhasha writers. A Spanish writer is a Spanish writer, a French one is a French writer; but a Bengali or a Kannad writer is not a Bengali or a Kannad writer. He is a Bhasha writer. It is as if it is a sub-species. It is amusing, this condescension.
I write about what I feel strongly about. I am not influenced by what other people want from me, and it doesn’t matter if very few people share what I believe.  I am not in a consumer market. Yes, I write for theatre, but I am not out to woo a large audience.
Social relevance and contemporary reality are not necessarily a must for good theatre, neither are they criteria by which to judge a play.

In Sunday supplement of The Indian Express.
13th Jan 2013


Saturday 12 January 2013

A Moment

A Moment

Life is the name of a few moments
And among them that single moment
In which two eyes speak as they
Look up from a cup of tea
And descend into the heart
They descend into the heart, and say
Today, you must not speak a word
Today, I shall not spaek a word
Just sit as we are
Holding hand in hand
Holding the gift of pain
Holding the warmth of feelings
For who knows, at this very moment
Far away upon a mountain, the snow begins to melt.

By Kaifi for his beloved wife Shaukat

From

Kaifi & I....A Memoir
Shakaut Kaifi
Edited and traslated by Nasreen Rehman

एक संमेलन

८६ व्या अखिल भारतीय मराठी साहित्य संमेलनाची ग्रंथदिंडी  हमीद दलवाई यांच्या मिरजोळी गावातील घरापासून निघणार होती. पारंपारिक विचारांच्या काही लोकांनी विरोध करताच आमच्या मराठी  साहित्यिकांनी-संयोजकांनी दिंडीचा कार्यक्रम बदलला. भाऊ पाध्ये यांच्या 'राडा'ची होळी करणाऱ्या शिवसेनाप्रमुखांच नाव मंचाला देताना होणारा विरोध मात्र साहित्यिकांनी-संयोजकांनी फेटाळून लावला. साहित्यिक!! अभिव्यक्ती स्वातंत्र्याच्या गप्पा मारणाऱ्या साहित्यिकांचे संमेलन कि केवळ  लोकप्रियता जपणाऱ्या  ''मराठी'' साहित्यिकांचे संमेलन??